Grok Bot and ChatGPT Work both promise an agent that logs into your apps and finishes a job on its own. Here is what each one actually does, what it costs, and where they genuinely differ.
1. What is Grok Bot?
Grok Bot is xAI's always-on AI agent product, announced on 11 August 2026. According to xAI's official announcement, each Bot runs on its own computer in the cloud, signs into apps and websites much like a person would, and works through a multi-step task without needing a prompt at every stage, only returning to you when it finishes or needs approval for something consequential such as sending a message or spending money.
It ships as an app for macOS, Windows, Linux and iOS, with Android listed as coming soon, and it is bundled into SuperGrok and Cursor subscriptions rather than sold on its own. For the fuller picture on how it works, see our guide to what Grok Bot is.
2. Is ChatGPT agent still available?
No. OpenAI's own help centre now states plainly that ChatGPT agent is no longer available, and directs users to ChatGPT Work instead for longer, multi-step tasks and finished deliverables. The change followed OpenAI folding its earlier Operator research preview into ChatGPT agent in mid-2025, before retiring that agent mode entirely when ChatGPT Work launched on 9 July 2026.
ChatGPT Work is built on GPT-5.6 and is described on OpenAI's own product page as an agent that gathers information across your connected apps and files, then stays with a project for hours, breaking it into steps and producing a finished document, spreadsheet, slide deck or small web app rather than a chat reply. It sits alongside a separate Chat mode for quick questions and Codex for programming work.
Grok Bot and ChatGPT Work start from the same idea, an agent that logs into your apps and finishes a job, but they reach it through different products and different plans.
3. Grok Bot vs ChatGPT Work: how they actually compare
Both products start from a similar idea: instead of answering one question at a time, an agent takes a job, works through it largely unsupervised, and checks back with you before anything consequential happens. xAI's documentation describes Grok Bot pausing for your approval before it sends a message, publishes anything or spends money, and OpenAI's help pages describe ChatGPT Work in similar terms, staying with a task for hours and returning with a result rather than asking for step-by-step instructions.
The two diverge in how they reach that result. Grok Bot gives each Bot its own persistent cloud computer that can log into almost any app or website the way a person would, plus a set of built-in connectors for Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, Outlook Mail and Calendar, Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive and Salesforce, with a Bring Your Own MCP option for anything else. ChatGPT Work instead centres on producing a finished artefact from your connected apps and files, such as a spreadsheet, a slide deck, or a small interactive site built with OpenAI's Sites feature, rather than acting inside a wide spread of third-party apps directly.
One feature that is genuinely distinct to Grok Bot, based on what each company has published, is its group chat format. xAI's documentation lets you put two to six Bots into one conversation, where they can message each other, hand a task off between themselves and keep working without you copying context from one chat to another. OpenAI's published material on ChatGPT Work describes a single agent working through a task, not a group of agents collaborating in one chat.
4. Grok Bot vs ChatGPT price
Neither product is sold as a standalone purchase; both ride on a subscription you already hold. Grok Bot is bundled into eight SuperGrok and Cursor plans, from Cursor Pro at $20 a month up to SuperGrok Heavy at $300 a month, each with its own separate weekly usage allowance, according to xAI's pricing announcements.
ChatGPT Work follows a similar shape but a different ladder. OpenAI's product page says the desktop app version of Work is available on every ChatGPT plan, including Free, while the web and mobile version needs Plus or higher. That puts the cheapest paid route to ChatGPT Work at Plus, $20 a month, the same entry price as Grok Bot's cheapest route through Cursor Pro. Pro sits at $100 or $200 a month for higher usage, and Business is billed per seat, typically in the $20 to $25 range depending on the billing term.
5. Which plans include Grok Bot vs ChatGPT Work
For Grok Bot, that is SuperGrok ($30), SuperGrok Plus ($100), SuperGrok Heavy ($300), Cursor Pro ($20), Cursor Pro+ ($60), Cursor Ultra ($200), and Cursor Teams' Standard and Premium seats, per xAI's own plans page. See our full breakdown of Grok Bot pricing for the current list and how the weekly allowance works.
For ChatGPT Work, OpenAI lists Free on desktop only, then Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu, with the web and mobile app versions starting at Plus. If your team already standardises on a particular set of apps, check which connectors each product actually supports for those tools before assuming either one covers your stack, since both are recent products and their connector lists are still expanding.
6. Grok Bot vs ChatGPT Work: which should you use?
There is no single winner here, because the two products are shaped by different existing habits. If you already pay for Cursor or SuperGrok and want an agent that can log into apps beyond a fixed connector list, including ones with no official integration, Grok Bot's browser-and-login approach and its multi-bot group chats are the more distinctive features. If your team already lives in ChatGPT and mainly wants a finished document, spreadsheet or small internal tool out of a multi-step research task, ChatGPT Work is built around exactly that output.
Both are recent products still settling into their current shape, so treat any comparison, including this one, as a snapshot. The practical test is the same for either: hand it one real, low-risk task you would normally give a colleague for an afternoon, read what it actually did before trusting the next run, and judge it on the result rather than the launch demo.